But while tall wooden buildings hold symbolic importance, the construction of wooden houses and office blocks is likely to contribute to lower environmental and climate impacts.
Tomas Alsmarker, head of innovation at Swedish Wood, said the country had seen a huge change in building materials over the past five years.
Sweden hopes to lead innovation in timber architecture, with 70 per cent of its land covered in forests.
For over a century, Sweden banned wooden homes above two storeys high. Now it is the material of choice in the country with the largest percentage of forestland in Europe.
“For all buildings up to eight storeys high, the question is not whether it’s possible to do it in wood. You should ask why we should not do it in wood.”
The project will, as existing wooden skyscrapers do, employ large prefabricated sections made from what is called “engineered timber”, a composite in which layers of wood are laminated together in specific ways. The wood grains in each layer are aligned to provide individual components of the building – such as floors, walls, cross braces and beams – with extremely high levels of strength.
While some have raised concerns about the potential fire risks posed, designers argue that engineered timber burns at a relatively slow and predictable rate, making it safer than many conventional steel structures.
Stockholm Wood City will be located in Sickla.
Credit: Atrium Ljungberg
There also remains some disagreement over whether forests are more effective in reducing carbon emissions when left alone or when they are managed sustainably and harvested for wood production.
Several studies have shown that substituting mass timber for steel and concrete can decrease greenhouse gas emissions by up to 26.5 per cent. But using more wood also risks outraging environmentalists, who argue it will have further negative impacts on forests, which store carbon dioxide and sustain the livelihoods of many communities.
Almost all the forest in Sweden can be defined as managed, with only the northernmost mountain regions having areas of virgin forest, that have not been affected by agriculture or silviculture. Of the forest harvested, about 47 per cent goes to sawmills, 45 per cent to the pulp industry in the form of pulpwood and 8 per cent becomes firewood or poles.
Scientists say carbon sequestration potential makes wooden buildings a valuable tool in combating climate change, while wooden structures also offer better indoor air quality and can be built with significantly lower carbon emissions compared with conventional materials.
Loading
As a natural thermal insulator, timber performs 15 times better than concrete and 400 times better than steel, so less energy is required to heat a building. Studies have also shown that spending time in timber buildings can be calming.
A university in Finland even considered how people react to different woods. Glued laminated birch, old oak, oak log and grey oak were found to be “beautiful”, leading to positive emotions. Finely sawn spruce, laminate, oriented strand board (similar to plywood) and lacquered oak parquet were less popular.
#Swedens #bold #plan #build #city #wood